http://writersalmanac.org/episodes/20160919/
On this day in 1796, President George Washington's farewell address was printed in
the Daily American Advertiser as an open
letter to American citizens. The most famous of all his
"speeches," it was never actually spoken; a week after its
publication in this Philadelphia newspaper, it was reprinted in papers all over
the country.
The address
was a collaborative effort that took Washington months to finalize,
incorporating the notes that James Madison had prepared four years prior when
Washington intended to retire after his first term, as well as numerous edits
from Alexander Hamilton and a critique from John Jay. Madison, Hamilton, and
Jay were accustomed to writing collectively; together they had published
the Federalist Papers, 85 newspaper articles published
throughout the 13 states to introduce and explain their proposal for a
Constitution.
Now only
eight years old, the Constitution was in danger, Washington feared, of falling
prey to the whims of popular sentiment. In 6,086 words, his address seeks to
encourage the nation to respect and maintain the Constitution, warning that a
party system — not yet the governmental standard operating procedure — would
reduce the nation to infighting. He urged Americans to relinquish their
personal or geographical interests for the good of the national interest,
warning that "designing men" would try to distract them from their
larger common views by highlighting their smaller, local differences. "You
cannot shield yourselves too much against the jealousies and heartburnings
which spring from these misrepresentations; they tend to render alien to each
other those who ought to be bound together by fraternal affection," he
wrote.
Washington
also feared interference by foreign governments, and as such extolled the
benefits of a stable public credit to be used sparingly, recommending avoiding
debt by "cultivating peace" and "by vigorous exertion in time of
peace to discharge the debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned."
Although he conceded that "the execution of these maxims" — or, in
layman's terms, balancing the budget — was the responsibility of the
government, Washington wagged a finger at individual citizens too, reminding
them that "it is essential that you should practically bear in mind that
towards the payment of debts there must be revenue; that to have revenue there must
be taxes; that no taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient
and unpleasant ..."
6 comments:
We are so lucky to have had such wise leaders!
Maybe everyone, not just our American cousins, should read that speech. If they had, Brexit might never have occurred, and Europe might escape its current, worrying trends.
I try to take comfort from the fact that commercial oddities and/or right-wing threats have sought to become the US president but have been put where they belong by electoral common-sense. Barry Goldwater and Ross Perot spring to mind. But the greatest worry occurred yesterday when the bombs started going off in New York and in Minnesota, with IS claiming some of the credit.
IS isn't attempting to convert the world to a perverted view of Islam; for the moment it is enough for them to create chaos and extreme reactions among the citizenry. IS's belief being that we will then be at each other's throats and our civilisations will collapse. The perfect scenario for encouraging the election of DT.
During my six years in the US there was one thing I never understood. It's only anecdotal evidence, I know, but the majority of Americans seemed to hold the federal government in absolute contempt. By definition everything Washington did was wrong. I know too that this can't be true but it seemed like it. And there was further supportive proof in reports of crazy, no doubt unrepresentative groups; I seem to recall one that was anti-income-tax. Old George would nod his head at this, while DT would beam seraphically.
More recent and even worse is a group (let's hope they're small) who believe that the Constitution is now out of date and should be rewritten. So much for the wisdom of the Founding Fathers.
The sense of deja vu gets ever stronger. Large worldwide forces are at work and their ultimate influence cannot be predicted; just like the thirties except that this time things are much closer to home for the US. For a time we all comforted ourselves with the belief that the Twin Towers was an isolated and, perhaps, unlucky event that would now be prevented. But these newer bombs, although smaller in impact, are almost impossible to detect, as France has found to its cost. And DT may feast on bombs.
Old George is right as is his prescription for "cultivating peace" but that's a hard row to hoe as John Kerry is finding out with Syria. We ache for a blinding flash of light that makes all this clear and, thereby, changes minds, many of them justifiably disappointed. When Hilary stumbled it seemed like the last straw.
For me I cling to one cynical view of things. That a DT presidency would turn out to be so buffoonish and impractical that he would be laughed out of office. But it may be we are not in a laughing mood.
A good bit of recycling, Crow.
There are "politicians" now. Oh for statesmen like Washington, especially in these times. We all seem to be ruled by self-serving pygmies!
Thanks for quoting me in print. I'm finally famous!
My mention of George Washington is due to the fact that I'm finally getting around to reading Democracy In America by Alexis deToqueville, which I was assigned in college like many millions of kids but in my case never read. I think Garrison Keillor mentioned Washington for the same reason because Keillor looks like a slacker to me.
DeTouqueville really believed the founders were exceptional and in trying to explain that, he said it was probably because when they met in Philadelphia to write the constitution it was a perilous time, the union was disintegrating before their eyes, the articles of confederation weren't working and what they had fought and sacrificed for was coming apart and that must have brought out the best in them. I think he would agree with Avus in that we are ruled by self serving pygmies now.
It's a very good book, by the way, a brilliant analysis of what American democracy was and how and why it worked fifty years on. I recommend it for every citizen, politician and PBS weekend program host.
Yes, there's little doubt the adults left the stage long ago. The good news is that ,little by little, all the rest of us are growing more wise. I think...
Post a Comment